Back to blog
Mar 18, 2023
4 min read

The Complete Environmental Profile of Waterless Fleet Valeting

A detailed analysis of the environmental impact of waterless fleet care versus traditional methods — covering water, chemicals, energy, waste, and regulatory compliance.

For sustainability officers preparing environmental disclosures, and procurement teams evaluating fleet care tenders, a detailed understanding of the environmental profile of waterless valeting is essential. This article provides a comprehensive analysis.

Water Impact

Traditional Washing

  • Consumption: 100–150 litres of potable water per vehicle
  • Source: Mains water supply (metered commercial rate)
  • Wastewater: 100% of water used becomes contaminated wastewater
  • Discharge: Enters surface water drainage or foul sewer (trade effluent consent required)

Waterless Valeting

  • Consumption: Zero litres
  • Source: Not applicable
  • Wastewater: None generated
  • Discharge: None

Net saving per vehicle per service: 100–150 litres

Chemical Impact

Traditional Washing

  • Products used: Detergent, traffic film remover, wheel cleaner, tyre dressing, interior cleaner (typically 5–7 separate products)
  • Composition: Often petroleum-based with phosphates, solvents, and surfactants
  • Disposal: Enters drainage system with wastewater
  • Environmental fate: Contributes to eutrophication, aquatic toxicity, and bioaccumulation

Waterless Valeting

  • Products used: Single waterless formula with integrated ceramic protection
  • Composition: Biodegradable, pH-neutral, zero petroleum derivatives
  • Disposal: Retained on microfibre cloths; commercially laundered
  • Environmental fate: Biodegrades completely; no aquatic impact

Energy Impact

Traditional Washing

  • Water heating: 1–3 kWh per vehicle (where hot wash used)
  • Pressure washing equipment: 1–2 kWh per vehicle
  • Water recycling systems: Additional energy for facilities with recycling
  • Lighting and ventilation: For indoor wash facilities

Waterless Valeting

  • Equipment energy: Negligible (hand application, no powered equipment)
  • Transport: Single technician vehicle servicing multiple fleet vehicles per visit
  • Total energy per vehicle: Fraction of traditional methods

Waste Impact

Traditional Washing

  • Wastewater: Primary waste stream requiring treatment
  • Sludge: From interceptors and settlement tanks (requires licenced disposal)
  • Product packaging: Multiple product containers per service
  • Cloths and materials: Often disposable or heavily contaminated

Waterless Valeting

  • Wastewater: None
  • Sludge: None
  • Product packaging: Minimal (concentrated formula, bulk supply)
  • Cloths: Reusable microfibre, commercially laundered and recycled

Regulatory Compliance Summary

RegulationTraditional WashingWaterless Valeting
Water Industry Act 1991 (trade effluent)Consent requiredNot applicable
Environmental Permitting RegulationsMay applyNot applicable
Hazardous Waste Regulations (interceptor sludge)AppliesNot applicable
COSHH (chemical handling)Multiple assessments requiredSingle product assessment

Data for ESG Reporting

MMCC provides the following documented data per fleet visit:

  • Total water saved (litres)
  • Vehicles serviced (count by type)
  • Products used (biodegradable confirmation)
  • Waste generated (zero discharge confirmation)
  • Estimated carbon reduction versus traditional methods

This data is compiled into monthly and annual reports formatted for inclusion in:

  • Annual sustainability reports
  • CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) submissions
  • ISO 14001 environmental management documentation
  • Scope 3 emissions calculations
  • Tender submissions requiring environmental evidence

Conclusion

Waterless fleet valeting does not just reduce environmental impact — it eliminates entire categories of environmental harm. Zero water, zero runoff, zero trade effluent, minimal energy, minimal waste. For any organisation serious about its environmental commitments, the evidence is unambiguous.

Explore MMCC’s ESG-Ready Fleet Care →